6400 block of W DIVERSEY AVE
10 restaurants have held a licence on this block since 2002. 3 are trading today. Belmont Cragin.
Everyone who has traded here
Oldest first, from the City of Chicago’s licence record. A closing year is the year the licence lapsed, which trails the day the door shut — often by many months.
| Restaurant | Concept | Address | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUPER CHINA BUFFET | Chinese | 6465 W DIVERSEY AVE B-09- | 2001 – 2003 Inferred: dated from a licence that lapsed |
| SUBWAY | Sandwich / Sub | 6465 W DIVERSEY AVE D121A | 2002 – 2006 Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it |
| SBARRO'S | Italian / Pizza | 6465 W DIVERSEY AVE | 2002 – 2003 Inferred: dated from a licence that lapsed |
| MCDONALD'S | American / Burger | 6465 W DIVERSEY AVE | 2002 – 2003 Inferred: dated from a licence that lapsed |
| STARBUCKS COFFEE #7948 | Coffee / Cafe | 6451 W DIVERSEY AVE 1 1 | 2004 – 2016 Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it |
| DUNKIN DONUTS BASKIN ROBBINS | Coffee / Cafe | 6445 W DIVERSEY AVE D-9 | 2005 – 2010 Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it |
| QUIZNOS SUB | Sandwich / Sub | 6451 W DIVERSEY AVE G-7 | 2005 – 2007 Inferred: dated from a licence that lapsed |
| Jimmy John's | Sandwich / Sub | 6451 W DIVERSEY AVE | 2009 – open |
| TACOS EL JEFE INC | Mexican | 6440 W DIVERSEY AVE 1 | 2024 – open |
| Jimmy Johns 739 | Sandwich / Sub | 6451 W DIVERSEY AVE | 2026 – open |
Watch Belmont Cragin.
Everything above is the record as it stands today. Get an email when a new restaurant licence appears in Belmont Cragin, and nothing at all in the weeks when none does. It covers openings only: a closure takes about three years to surface fully in the public record, and we will not send an alert we cannot stand behind.
What the block does not tell you
A block that has turned over often is worth knowing about before signing on it, but the count on its own is not a verdict — a busy corridor churns partly because it is busy. The read scores a specific concept for a specific operator against one storefront's own record, which is the question this page cannot answer.
Read an address on this block