Skip to main content
Restaurants0Since 2002, one row per concept at an address
Trading now00.0% of all attempts
Closed / lapsed0Licence expired and never renewed
Zip codes covered0Every zip with at least one trading restaurant
The turnover

Openings and closures, year by year

One row per restaurant, on its first licence start and its last known expiration. Both charts begin at 2003, because the record starts in 2002, so the 2002 bucket is a census of what already existed rather than a cohort. The note under the charts has the numbers.

New openings by year

First licence start, one row per restaurant.

Closures by year

Dated at the first food inspection that found the business gone, or at the licence expiry where no inspection ever did. Approximate: a licence lapses some months after the doors close, and an inspection records the day somebody looked.

The by-year charts start at 2003 because the record does. Chicago's licence data begins in 2002, so every restaurant already trading that day enters it with a 2002 start: 4,163 of them, against roughly 700 in a normal year. That bucket is not an opening cohort, it is a census of what already existed, and it flatters itself: it survives four years at 63.9% against 47.4% for 2003, because those businesses had already proven they could trade before the record ever saw them. The same floor bounds what the survival model is trained on. The counts above are unaffected. A restaurant that opened in 2002 is a real restaurant.

The last few years read low because closures take years to surface, not because fewer restaurants closed. A closure here is dated at the earliest evidence we hold: the licence lapse, an inspector recording the business out of business, or the operator announcing it, whichever came first. That is the tightest bound the record supports, because every one of those signals is a date by which trading had already stopped. What it cannot do is tell us sooner. Measured against cohorts whose outcomes are now fully known, the public record reveals about 18% of closures within a year and is only complete at three, so the bars nearest today are the ones still filling in. Read this chart as a decade rather than as one year against another, and do not read the right-hand edge as a recovery.

Where they are

The city, ranked

Trading restaurants by zip code and by neighborhood. Counts are live, so a licence that lapses drops out of both on the next refresh.

Top zip codes by trading restaurants

Top neighborhoods by trading restaurants

Watch one neighbourhood.

This page is the whole city. Pick the area you actually care about and we will email you when a new restaurant licence appears there, and stay quiet when none does. It covers openings only: a closure takes about three years to surface fully in the public record, and we will not send an alert we cannot stand behind.

What sits behind a read

Six surfaces, one record

Every read draws on all of these. They are the record itself, not model output. The score is what the model makes of them.

Property data

Parcel and address details behind every license.

Licensing history

Every issue, renewal, and lapse for a location.

Trade area

Market context around a site, not zip-code guesses.

Demographics

Who's around a site and whether they can support it.

Restaurant density

Active licenses by cuisine near a site.

Occupancy signals

Turnover and time-on-market ahead of a listing.

Restaurants only. Chicago's Retail Food Establishment licence also covers groceries, corner shops, pharmacies, hotels and school cafeterias (45% of the licence record) and none of them are counted anywhere on this page.