Skip to main content

2500 block of N LARAMIE AVE

8 restaurants have held a licence on this block since 2002. 1 are trading today. Belmont Cragin.

Everyone who has traded here

Oldest first, from the City of Chicago’s licence record. A closing year is the year the licence lapsed, which trails the day the door shut — often by many months.

RestaurantConceptAddressYears
LA LOMA "CARNICERIA Y TAQUERIA"Mexican2535 N LARAMIE AVE 12002 – 2016
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it
PANADERIA MARQUEZBakery / Dessert2506 N LARAMIE AVE2007 – 2012
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it
El Batey Cafe y masCoffee / Cafe2525 N LARAMIE AVE 12008 – 2023
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it
CUERNAVACA BAKERYBakery / Dessert2506 N LARAMIE AVE2012 – 2017
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it
CARNICERIA DOS GALLOSMexican2535 N LARAMIE AVE 1ST2016 – 2017
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it
ESQUINA DEL SABOR CATROCHORestaurant (unspecified)2525 N LARAMIE AVE 12016 – 2019
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it
ESQUINA DEL SABOR CATROCHO
A city inspection recorded it operating on May 19, 2026. The most recent licence on record for it expired Mar 15, 2026.
Restaurant (unspecified)2535 N LARAMIE AVE 1ST2020 – inspected after expiry
NAGUARA AREPASLatin / Caribbean2525 N LARAMIE AVE 12024 – 2026
Confirmed: an inspection or the operator dated it

Watch Belmont Cragin.

Everything above is the record as it stands today. Get an email when a new restaurant licence appears in Belmont Cragin, and nothing at all in the weeks when none does. It covers openings only: a closure takes about three years to surface fully in the public record, and we will not send an alert we cannot stand behind.

What the block does not tell you

A block that has turned over often is worth knowing about before signing on it, but the count on its own is not a verdict — a busy corridor churns partly because it is busy. The read scores a specific concept for a specific operator against one storefront's own record, which is the question this page cannot answer.

Read an address on this block